Singularities in Science, Technology and Society: Typologies, Comparative Analyses, and Interpretive Frameworks
Keywords:
Singularity, Future of Science, Future of Society, Mathematical Singularity, Physical Singularity, Technological Singularity, Ecological Singularity, Philosophical Singularity, Economic Singularity, Tipping point, Phase transition, EthicsAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to synthesize a cross-disciplinary typology of "singularity" concepts, ranging from mathematical and physical to technological and socio-ecological domains. It aims to provide comparative analyses and a SWOC (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Challenges) framework to evaluate the mechanisms, impacts, and governance readiness of different singularity types. Ultimately, the paper seeks to clarify why the concept matters, offering interpretive tools and ethical guidance for navigating these profound, potentially irreversible transitions in science and society.
Methodology: Qualitative exploratory research where the relevant information is collected using keyword-based search using Google, Google Scholar, and AI-driven GPTs. The information is analysed using suitable analysis frameworks as per the objectives of the paper.
Analysis: This paper develops a comprehensive cross-disciplinary typology of singularities, categorizing them into mathematical, physical, technological, and socio-philosophical types. Through a comparative analysis and SWOC framework, it evaluates each type's mechanisms, measurability, and societal impact, revealing a critical governance gap for high-impact technological and ecological singularities. The results underscore that these events represent points where predictive models break down, necessitating new scientific theories, proactive risk governance, and ethical frameworks to navigate their profound and potentially irreversible consequences.
Originality: This paper provides an original and valuable cross-disciplinary synthesis by constructing a unified typology of singularities—from mathematical and physical to technological and socio-ecological—that is not found in existing literature. Its value lies in offering comparative analytical tools like SWOC analysis and evaluation rubrics, which enable structured interpretation and governance of high-impact, irreversible transitions across scientific and societal domains.
Type of Paper: Review-based exploratory research.
